Features

This material is produced by the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies
What's New in the Database
Belarus Nuclear Weapons
Strategic Weapons Overview
Weapons on Territory
ICBM Designations/Number of Warheads
ICBM Bases
START-Accountable Launchers   Warheads
Tactical Nuclear Weapons
Denuclearization Overview
Missile Deactivation and Warhead Transfer
Silo/Launcher Dismantlement
Issues Surrounding Missile Transfer to Russia
Financial Compensation


Belarus: Silo/Launcher Dismantlement
This is an archived page. Please visit the new Belarus country profile

Belarus: Silo/Launcher Dismantlement

5/8/99: LUKASHENKA SAYS BELARUS DID NOT DESTROY LAUNCH PADS FOR RUSSIAN WEAPONS
At a press conference in Volgograd, Russia, on 8 May 1999, Belarusian President Alyaksandr Lukashenka said that while Belarus has not discussed the return of nuclear weapons to Belarus in the event of union with Russia, "all launch pads have been preserved despite pressure on the part of both NATO and Russia."
[ITAR-TASS World Service broadcast, 8 May 1999; in "Belarus Ready for Concessions in Union with Russia," FBIS Document FTS19990508001040.] {Entered 6/8/99 FW}
 
2/20/98:  BELARUS WILL DISMANTLE ITS LAUNCH PADS
Belarusian Chief of Staff Mikhail Kazlov (Kozlov) announced in Minsk that Belarus intends to dismantle its strategic missile launch pads despite the lack of US funds.  Kazlov stated that since Belarus has declared itself a nuclear-free territory, the launch pads serve no military purpose.  US Ambassador to Belarus Daniel Speckhard told journalists that the US government suspended the $1.9 million allocated for launch pad demolition following Belarus' refusal to allow US experts access to mobile missile sites and in response to Belarusian human rights violations.  Speckhard stated that the United States is pleased with Belarus' intent to destroy the launch pads itself.[1]  Belarusian Foreign Minister Ivan Antonovich said that Belarus intends to fulfill its commitments to the world community and complete the launch pad dismantlement by 2001.[2]
[1] "Belarus To Scrap Missile Launch Pads on Its Own, General Says," Interfax, 20 February 1998, No. 4.
[2] Valeriy Kovalev, "These Recalcitrant 'Kronas': The United States Has Stopped Aid for Elimination of Nuclear Missile Launch Pads in Belarus," Krasnaya zvezda, 15 January 1998, p. 3; in "Loss of Nuclear Missile Elimination Aid," FBIS-SOV-98-030, 30 January 1998. {updated 3/10/98 djw}
 
1/23/98:  US FIRM REMOVES  EQUIPMENT FROM BELARUS
Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI) has been preparing customs documents to remove demolition equipment from Belarus following the cancellation of its contract.[1]  CDI won a contract to dismantle Krona (SS-25) launch pads in Belarus in 1996, but the equipment sat unused at Building Trust No. 4 for over 18 months.[1]  Only three of the 81 launch pads have been demolished; the remaining 78, which CDI was to destroy, are still intact.[3]  According to Belapan radio, although $1.9 million from Nunn-Lugar funds were disbursed for the destruction of the site, the Belarus government denied CDI access to the launch pads.  According to US Assistant Secretary of Defense Edward Warner, Belarus will have to destroy the launch pads without US financial assistance.  (The United States suspended CTR funding for Belarus in March 1997.[4]) US Ambassador to Belarus Daniel Speckhard stated that the United States does not view the existence of the Krona launch pads as a threat and that this incident will not harm relations between the two countries.  Unnamed specialists have questioned the need to demolish the abandoned launch pads since they present no strategic threat; mobile Topol-M missile systems would not require Krona launch pads.  The Belarusian subcontactor to CDI (Building Trust No. 4) also doubted that the allotted funds would have been enough to cover the entire project, given the conditions in winter, the dense forests, and the need to provide housing to contractors.[2]
[1] Belapan Radio, 23 January 1998; in "Company Hired To Destroy Belarus Launch Pads Returns to US," FBIS-UMA-98-023.
[2] Valeriy Kovalev, "These Recalcitrant 'Kronas': The United States Has Stopped Aid for Elimination of Nuclear Missile Launch Pads in Belarus," Krasnaya zvezda, 15 January 1998, p. 3; in "Loss of Nuclear Missile Elimination Aid," FBIS-SOV-98-030, 30 January 1998.
[3] Sergey Sokolov, 0"Minsk ne speshit vypolnyat usloviya dogovora SNV-1," Segodnya, 29 January 1998. {updated 3/10/98 djw}
[4] "U.S. cuts off $40 million in aid to Belarus," Reuters, 21 March 1997.{updated 7/28/98 FW}

 
6/4/96: BELARUS SUBCONTRACTOR FOR SS-25 LAUNCH PAD DEMOLITION
Building Trust No. 4, a Belarusian construction organization, will be a subcontractor for the American company Controlled Demolition Incorporated, in the mechanical demolition of the Krona missile launch pads. This demolition will be carried out in accordance with the START-I Treaty over a period of 25 months.
[BELAPAN, 6/2/96, in "Belarus: Doubts Over U.S. Company's Ability To Destroy Rocket Silos," FBIS-SOV-98-108, 6/4/96.]
 
3/22/96: LEFTOVER MISSILE FUEL IN BELARUS AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD
Reportedly, there are 7200 tons of missile fuel that have been left at points throughout Belarus. Some of these sites are as close as 2.5 km. from inhabited areas. All of the tanks in which the fuel is stored date from 1965-70, but were designed to be used for only 15 years. At one location outside of Lida, 1800 tons are stored, while close to the Polish border, another 1200 tons are stored. According to the Institute of Radiation Safety (Minsk) Director Vasiliy Nesterenko, the Nunn-Lugar program to burn the fuel will take approximately three years. the Institute is currently tasked with recycling 120 tons of the fuel, which it can reportedly do in four months time. According to a 2/96 CTR brief, there are 1000 MT of liquid rocket fuel and approximately 9000 tons of liquid rocket oxidizer in Belarus.
[CISNP Discussions With Ukrainian Official, 3/22/96; "Destruction And Dismantlement," CTR: FORECAST TO INDUSTRY, 2/23/96.]
 
12/28/95: TENDER FOR LAUNCH PAD DEMOLITION
The U.S. Defense Nuclear Agency announced a tender for the best project to eliminate the Krona (SS-25) missile launch pads. The Belarusian Ministry of Defense announced that more than 20 U.S. and Belarusian enterprises, organizations, and firms have applied to take part. The actual work will begin later in 1996.
[Valeriy Kovalev, "Only 'Krona' Left After Topol Withdrawal," KRASNAYA ZVEZDA, 12/28/95, p. 3; in FBIS-TAC-96-001, 12/28/95.]
 
11/1/95: LAUNCH PAD DEMOLITION ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
There is a lack of funds and technology for the rehabilitation of territory after the destruction of the SS-25 launch pads. Spilled missile fuel is also a threat to the environment and has been a concern for Belarus during the ICBM missile withdrawal.
[CISNP Discussions with Belarusian official, 10/95.]
 
10/18/95: RFP FOR SS-25 LAUNCH PAD DESTRUCTION
The U.S. Defense Nuclear Agency is scheduled to issue a request for proposals for the elimination of the 81 remaining foundation pads for ICBM launchers (Krona missile launch pads) in Belarus. The launch pads are located in three major locations and must be eliminated within two years of the awarding of the contract. Destruction of the launch pads is required under START-1, and the Defense Nuclear Agency contract is funded by the Nunn-Lugar CTR program. According to this source, proposals from interested bidders were expected sometime after 10/18/95.
["Defense Nuclear Agency: Foundation Pad Elimination in the Republic Of Belarus," POST-SOVIET NUCLEAR AND DEFENSE MONITOR, 10/31/95, pp. 13-14.]
 
8/15/95: SS-25 LAUNCH PAD DESTRUCTION METHODS
According to a Belarusian Defense Ministry official, the Belarusian leadership wishes its 81 Krona missile launch pads to be destroyed mechanically. Americans have suggested hydraulic fragmentation, which will crush the pads and result in material that can be used for gravel, crushed concrete and fittings. Under the withdrawal agreement, the launch pads should be destroyed by Russia. However, controlled explosions do not satisfy Belarus environmental standards. The first two pads were exploded and caused too much ecological harm. Belarusian leaders are also considering American help in burning, storing, and guarding the components of the 8,000 tons of propellant from the strategic nuclear missiles to be scrapped. One possibility is to convert the oxidant component into nitric-acid for fertilizer, which may end up costing more than it is worth. The U.S. Congress has pledged to provide $8 million for these projects and the United States is ready to start work by the middle of next year.
Sources:
[1] Aleksandr Korzhun, Igor Porshenev, Yevgeniy Terekhov, and others; "Diplomatic Panorama," INTERFAX, 8/15/95.
[2] "Delivery of Missiles to Russia to be Slowed by Belarus," POST-SOVIET NUCLEAR & DEFENSE MONITOR, 8/18/95, pp. 2-3.
[3] "Talks with US on Missile Bases, Fuel Detailed," BELAPAN, 8/17/95.
 
8/7/95: MEETING ON SS-25 LAUNCH PAD DESTRUCTION
A group of U.S. disarmament specialists met in Minsk to discuss the elimination of nuclear arms from Belarus. Discussion focused on the SS-25 launch pads. Belarusian studies have shown that destroying the pads via controlled explosions causes excessive environmental damage. Thus, a plan to destroy the launch pads has been halted.
[Ustina Markus, "Armament Specialists in Belarus," OMRI DAILY DIGEST, vol. 1, no. 154, p. 6.]
 
6/94: US CONFIRMS DETARGETING MISSILES
At the request of the Belarusian government, the U.S. State Department confirmed that there were no longer any strategic missiles aimed at the territory of the Republic of Belarus.
[Minsk Radio Minsk Network, 6/2/94; in 6/3/94, "Embassy Asks U.S. To Confirm Missile Aiming," FBIS-SOV-94-107.]
 
11/93: SHUSHKEVICH ON UKRAINIAN DENUCLEARIZATION
Stanislav Shushkevich, Chairman of the Belarusian Parliament, criticized Russian and U.S. pressure on Ukraine to become a non-nuclear state. He suggested that the best way for them to convince Ukraine to give up it nuclear weapons was to demonstrate the advantages to be gained from doing so.
[Ustina Markus, "Belarus Opposes Russian, US Pressure On Ukraine's Nuclear Stance," RFE/RL NEWS BRIEFS, Vol. 2, No. 48, 11/22/93, p. 17.]
 

Issues Surrounding Missile Transfer to Russia

FINANCIAL COMPENSATION

2/27/96: AGREEMENT ON COMPENSATION FOR HEU: BELARUS ENERGY DEBT WRITTEN OFF
In an official visit to Moscow, President Lukashenka agreed to an economic agreement which eliminates Belarus' energy debt to Russia in exchange for the highly enriched uranium already recovered from the nuclear missiles which were withdrawn from Belarus. According to an OMRI report, Belarus owed Russia almost $800 million for energy supplies and another $470 million for outstanding loans. Minsk has also reportedly made the claim that Moscow owes it $800 million for ecological damage caused by strategic missiles and $114 million for Russian troops stationed on its territory.
["President Lukashenka's First Official Visit To Moscow," Press release, The Embassy of Belarus to the United States of America, 2/27/96. See also Ustina Markus, "Belarusian President In Russia," OMRI DAILY DIGEST, 2/27/96.]
 
2/19/96: RUSSIA-BELARUS NEGOTIATIONS OVER WARHEAD HEU
According to Petr Kravchenko (Piotr Krauchanka), the Chairman of the International Affairs Committee of the Belarusian parliament, Russia is refusing to pay Minsk hundreds of millions of dollars for uranium recovered from strategic missiles that are being withdrawn from Belarus. All the reprocessed uranium is kept in Russia. Mikalay Karpiyevich, the head of the Belarusian Parliamentary Commission for National Security, Defense, and Crime Prevention reported that due to the lack of payment the remaining 18 SS-25 missiles in Belarus may not be withdrawn to Russia.
[SEGODNYA NEWSCAST, 2/19/96, in "Belarus Disputing Right To Uranium From Dismantled Missiles," FBIS-TAC-96-004, 2/19/96; Aleksandr Acheretnyy, "Our Task Is To Draft Proper Laws Which Meet The Demands Of Time And Are Accepted By The People," NARODNAYA GAZETA, 2/21/96, p. 1, in "Belarus: Official Outlines Call For New Military Doctrine," FBIS-TAC-96-004, 2/21/96.]
 
1/11/96: BELARUSIAN DEPUTY CLAIMS WARHEAD HEU WORTH $1.5 BILLION
Supreme Soviet Deputy Piotr Krauchanka accused Russia of appropriating uranium extracted from strategic missiles withdrawn from Belarus. Krauchanka stated that Belarus could claim $1.5 billion for the uranium. This figure is based on reports by Russian experts that the uranium extracted from missiles deployed in Belarus, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Russia is worth $10-12 billion. Belarus claimed 10-15% of the former USSR's nuclear potential.
[Vyacheslav Zyankovich, Interview with Piotr Krauchanka," ZVYAZDA, 1/9/96, p. 11; "In Belarus," POST-SOVIET NUCLEAR AND DEFENSE MONITOR, 1/31/96, p. 11. See also Ustina Markus, "Belarusian Deputy Accuses Moscow Over Uranium," OMRI DAILY DIGEST, 1/12/96.]
 
2/94: GRIB CALLS FOR COMPENSATION FOR TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS
Chairman of the Parliament Mechislav Grib pledged to uphold Belarus' commitment to nuclear disarmament and proceed with economic reforms. He said, "Hanging on to nuclear arms doesn't make economic sense for Belarus," and added that he would seek compensation from Moscow for the tactical nuclear weapons returned to Russia in 1992.
["Belarus's New Leader To Uphold Non-Nuclear Status," Reuter, 2/1/94.]
 
1/16/94: AGREEMENT ON TACTICAL WARHEAD COMPENSATION REPORTED
Interfax reported that Prime Minister Vyacheslau Kebich said that Russia agreed to compensate Belarus for the tactical nuclear weapons as well as the ICBMs that had been stationed on Belarusian territory. If Belarus were to receive compensation solely for the ICBMs, the figure is estimated at $50 million. If the tactical nuclear warheads were also included the figure would increase several fold, given that there were several hundred to a thousand such weapons in Belarus.
[John Lepingwell, "Belarus Requests Compensation For Nuclear Weapons," RFE/RL NEWS BRIEFS, 1/10/94, p. 2.]
 
1/94: BELARUS TO SEEK COMPENSATION FOR HEU FROM TACTICAL NUCLEAR WARHEADS
Valeriy Tsepkalo, a top foreign affairs advisor to former Belarusian leader Stanislav Shushkevich, said that Belarus plans to seek a share of the profits made from the sales of HEU from the nuclear weapons that are being dismantled. The agreement that Russia made with Ukraine prompted Belarus to request $500 million in compensation for the tactical nuclear warheads that were withdrawn to Russia from Belarus in 1992.
["Belarus Wants Share Of Nuclear Arms Sale," Reuter, 1/17/94.]

Last updated 14 February 2000

Comments or questions? Contact Michael Jasinski at MIIS CNS: Michael.Jasinski@miis.edu

CNSThis material is produced independently for NTI by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2002 by MIIS.

HOME  |  CONTACT US  |  SITE MAP