Submarine Proliferation

Pakistan Current Capabilities
Capabilities | Import | Export
|
|
The Pakistani Navy currently operates a fleet of eight diesel-electric submarines.[1] The vessels are based in Karachi, but in the future they are to be based at Port Ormara.[1] The main submarine fleet is comprised of four aging Daphne-class units, two Agosta-70 boats, as well as two modern Agosta-90B submarines, all of French design. An additional Agosta-90B is under construction. The final Agosta 90B will feature DCN's air-independent propulsion system, MESMA (Module d'Energie Sous-Marin Autonome), with which the two earlier Agosta-90B vessels will be retrofitted in the future. Pakistan has also announced its intention to construct additional submarines, in order to maintain its conventional deterrent against India.[2,3] The Pakistani Navy also has four Italian-designed midget submarines. These vessels, as well as the newest Agosta-90B boats, are being constructed at the Karachi Shipyard and Engineering Works.[4]
During the 1971 war between India and Pakistan, India effectively blockaded
Karachi, Pakistan's only major harbor. Pakistani efforts to curtail India's
naval supremacy were largely limited to its submarine force, which was able to
sink an Indian frigate.[5] Drawing on these experiences and the perceived threat
posed by a larger Indian Navy, Pakistan has been continuously investing in its
submarine force, within the constraints posed by its economy.
An effective sea-denial capability is of utmost importance to Pakistan, as 95
percent of its imports are transported by ship.[6] Consequently, Pakistan's Navy
in general and submarine flotilla in particular are tasked with protecting
Pakistani maritime interests and guaranteeing the security of its sea lanes, and
thus its access, to the northern Indian Ocean/Arabian Sea.[6,7,8]
In February 2001, the Pakistani Navy publicly considered the deployment of nuclear weapons aboard its submarines, arguing that it had to keep pace with developments in India.[9] However, in January 2003 Pakistan rescinded its statement, explaining that such an endeavor would be too costly.[10] Yet, shortly afterwards, a high-ranking naval officer stated that while Pakistan currently did not plan to arms its submarines with nuclear weapons, it would do so if forced.[11] Some have alleged that Pakistan is able to mount a nuclear device onto its French-provided SM39 Exocet missiles; however, this is currently unlikely due to the difficulty involved in building a nuclear warhead small enough for the missile (the Exocet normally carries a 165 kg warhead).[12,13]
In January 2006, the Pakistan Navy (PN) decommissioned all four of their Hangor-class submarines: Hangor, Shushuk, Mangro and Ghazi at the dockyard in Karachi. This decommissioning brings the total number of active duty submarines in the Pakistani Navy down to five. However, Pakistan is to receive three Agosta 90B-class boats from France during 2006.[14]
| Khalid (Agosta 90B) | ||||
| Displacement, tons: |
1,510 surfaced 1,760 submerged (1,960 with MESMA) |
![]() |
||
| Dimensions, ft (m): |
221.7×22.3×17.7 (67.6×6.8×5.4) |
|||
| Main machinery: | Hybrid diesel-electric/MESMA AIP | |||
| Speed, knots: |
12 surfaced 20 submerged |
|||
| Range, miles: | 8,500 at 9kt snorting; 350 at 3.5kt submerged, quadrupled at 4kt with MESMA | |||
| Complement: | 36 (7 officers) | |||
| Diving depth, ft (m): | 1,050 (320) | |||
| Endurance: | 68 days | |||
| Weapons: | 4 SSMs and 16 torpedoes; four 21in (533mm) tubes; mines in lieu of torpedoes | |||
|
Sources: |
||||
| Hashmat (Agosta 70) | ||||
| Displacement, tons: |
1,490 surfaced 1,740 submerged |
|
||
| Dimensions, ft (m): |
221.7×22.3×17.7
(67.6×6.8×5.4) |
|||
| Main machinery: | Diesel-electric | |||
| Speed, knots: |
12 surfaced 20 submerged |
|||
| Range, miles: |
8,500 at 9 knots surfaced 350 at 3.5 knots submerged |
|||
| Complement: | 59 (8 officers) | |||
| Diving depth, ft (m): | 985 (300) | |||
| Endurance: | Not available | |||
| Weapons: | 20 SSMs and torpedoes; four 21.7in (550mm) tubes; mines in lieu of torpedoes | |||
|
Sources: |
||||
| Hangor (Daphne) | ||||
| Displacement, tons: |
869 surfaced 1,043 submerged |
![]() |
||
| Dimensions, ft (m): |
189.6×22.3×15.1
(57.8×6.8×4.6) |
|||
| Main machinery: | diesel-electric | |||
| Speed, knots: |
13 surfaced 15.5 submerged |
|||
| Range, miles: |
4,500 at 5 knots surfaced 3,000 at 7 knots snorting |
|||
| Complement: | 53 (7 officers) | |||
| Diving depth, ft (m): | 985 (300) | |||
| Endurance: | Not available | |||
| Weapons: | 12 SSMs and torpedoes; twelve 21.7in (550mm) tubes; mines in lieu of torpedoes | |||
|
Sources: |
||||
| ACTIVE DUTY SUBMARINES | ||||||
| Name (Number) | Class | Base | Builder | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned |
| Hashmat (ex-Astrant) (S135) | Hashmat | Karachi | DCN (Dubigeon, Nantes) | September 1976 | December 1977 | February 1979 |
| Hurmat (ex-Adventurous) (S136) | Hashmat | Karachi | DCN (Dubigeon, Nantes) | September 1977 | December 1978 | February 1980 |
| Khalid (S137) | Khalid | Karachi | DCNI (Cherbourg) | July 1995 | August 1998 | September 1999 |
| Saad (S138) | Khalid | Karachi | Karachi Shipyard | June 1998 | 2000 | December 2003 |
| Hamza (S139) | Khalid | Karachi Shipyard | January 1997 | 2005 | 2006 | |
|
|
||||||
Sources:
[1]Abhijit Bhattacharyya, "Rise of an oily Navy," The Pioneer, August 9,
2000; in "Indian daily views implications of shifting of Pak Navy bases," FBIS
Document SAP20000809000038.
[2] Chief of Naval Staff
Admiral Shahid Karimullah, as cited in Zarar Khan, "Pakistan navy to get four
frigates from China," Associated Press, September 15, 2004; in
Lexis-Nexis,
http://web.lexis-nexis.com.
[3]Edward C. Whitman, "Air-Independent Propulsion: AIP Technology Creates A New
Undersea Threat," U.S. Navy Website,
http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/cno/n87/usw/issue_13/propulsion.htm.
[4] "Pakistan - Navy,"
Global Security Website,
http://www.globalsecurity.org.
[5] Jacques Isnard, "A Navy to a large extent under
France's wing," Le Monde online edition,
http://www.lemonde.fr, May 9, 2002; in
"Report details close links between France and Pakistani Navy," FBIS Document
EUP20020509000030.
[6] Interview with Admiral Fasih Bokhari, Chief of Naval Staff, "The importance
of the Pakistani Navy for its country's security," Naval Forces, 1999,
Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 22-25; in ProQuest Information and Learning Company,
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb.
[7] Interview with Admiral Shahid Karimullah, Chief of Naval Staff, Pakistani
Navy by Wolfgang Legien; in "Austral-Asian security comments: Navy chiefs
interviewed by Naval Forces editor-in-chief," Naval Forces, 2003, No. 2,
pp.55; in ProQuest Information and Learning Company,
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb.
[8] "PN’s achievement," The News, August 27, 2002; in "Pakistan daily
sees critical role for Navy as protector of country’s coastline," FBIS Document
SAP20020827000076.
[9] Zahid Hussain Karachi, "Pakistan May Put Nukes on Submarines," Associated
Press, February 22, 2001.
http://www.nukewatch.org/media/more_media/03-00-01/PMPNOS.html.
[10] "Pak Rules Out Nuclear Platform for Subs, To Upgrade Navy," The Press Trust
of India Limited, January 15, 2003; in Dow Jones Interactive Database.
[11] "World Roundup," The Miami Herald, January 26, 2003, p13. Herald
Wire Services; in Dow Jones Interactive Database.
[12] "Pakistan launches locally built submarine," Pak News online
edition,
http://paknews.com, August 25, 2002.
[13] "Exocet AM.39 / MM.40," Federation of American Scientists Website,
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/exocet.htm.
[14] "Pakistan Scraps Four Submarines,
Left with Five," Balochistan Times, January 2, 2006; in Lexis-Nexis,
http://web.lexis-nexis.com.
![]()
This
material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for
Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and
does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently
verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents. Copyright © 2007
by MIIS.
![]()









