|
|
 |
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
Proponents Say: Cut Off Some U.S. Economic Assistance and Support for Russia Unless it Ends
Sensitive Exports to Iran.
- Freeze Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR)
programs. End Russia's participation in the International Space Station.
End Russia's satellite launch quota.
- The basic purpose of these three programs is to prevent the leakage of Russian
missile and WMD materials and expertise, so that countries like Iran will
not be able to build missiles and WMD. It makes little sense for the United
States to spend billions of dollars on these programs when Russia is deliberately
helping Iran to build such arms.
Opponents
Say: Cutting Off U.S. Assistance to Russia Would Not Curtail Proliferation of
Sensitive Materials.
- U.S. CTR programs directly benefit U.S. national security by reducing the
danger of missile and WMD proliferation from Russia.
- Even if Russia is tolerating or participating in some questionable exports
to Iran, these sales represent a smaller threat than that posed by the loss
of control over WMD materials and expertise in Russia, which the U.S. CTR
programs try to prevent. From what is known publicly, serious leakage of WMD
expertise or materials could do much more to speed Iran's missile and WMD
programs than Russia's current exports.
- In addition, loss of control over Russian WMD materials and expertise in
Russia could allow them to wind up in the hands of other countries or terrorist
organizations.
- The United States needs Russian participation in the International Space
Station because Russia has more experience in long-duration manned space flight
and in developing certain types of equipment. The project, on which the United
States has spent billions of dollars and which symbolizes peaceful international
cooperation in space, could possibly be jeopardized without Russian participation.
- The United States benefits from allowing Russia to launch U.S. commercial
satellites. Russian launchers are much cheaper than U.S. launchers, reducing
costs and helping U.S. businesses, particularly telecommunications companies,
and consumers. Cutting off these programs could hurt the United States in
many ways, without guaranteeing that Russia will alter its export policies.
|
 |
Further Reading:

|
|

 |
 |
This material is produced independently for NTI by the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation
Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the
opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees,
agents. Copyright © 2004 by MIIS. |
 |
|
HOME
| CONTACT US
| GET INVOLVED
| SITE MAP
|
|