Chapter 5 Source: http://www.empnet.com/imageworks/Raj1.html

Israel

Israel’s Nuclear Weapons
[For an in-depth report on Israeli nuclear activities, see Israel’s Nuclear Profile.]

srael has not declared itself a nuclear weapon state, but is widely believed to possess a nuclear arsenal. Israel maintains an opaque nuclear policy, fearing that any outward declaration would exacerbate tensions in the Middle East. It cites its need for a nuclear deterrent against the WMD and missile programs of hostile neighbors. Some scholars believe that a nuclear event in the South Atlantic in 1979 was associated with the Israeli nuclear weapon program, possibly carried out in collaboration with South Africa. Some sources estimate that Israel possesses up to 200 nuclear weapons.

Israel and the International Nonproliferation Regime

Israel is a notable outsider from the NPT regime. The issue of Israel's non-adherence to the NPT has been raised repeatedly by other Middle Eastern NPT states at review conferences, which convene every five years to assess implementation of the treaty. By the time of the 2000 Review Conference, Israel was the only state in the Middle East that had not joined the treaty. Israel has responded that acceptance of the NPT, or equivalent treaty undertakings, is dependent upon achievement of a comprehensive peace in the region, and the renunciation of other forms of WMD by all Middle Eastern states.

On September 6, 2007, Israel conducted an air strike against a site in the Syrian Desert, hitting a facility near the Euphrates River. Israel and American intelligence analysts hypothesized that the destroyed facility had been an unfinished nuclear reactor. U.S. intelligence sources confirmed this ascertain during a press briefing in April 2008. The officials elaborated that the reactor was based on a North Korean design, was incomplete at the time of the air strike, and had not been loaded with nuclear materials. IAEA officials have expressed displeasure that Israel and the United States failed to provide the agency with intelligence of Syria’s nuclear reactor activities before the September air strike. The IAEA officials have stated that a lack of available evidence on Syria’s nuclear activities precluded IAEA action in the matter, arguing in a June 2008 press release that Israel’s unilateral strike “undermin[ed] the due process of verification that is at the heart of the non-proliferation regime.”

 

 

Chapter 5, page 5 of 11

This material is produced independently for NTI by the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of and has not been independently verified by NTI or its directors, officers, employees, agents.
Copyright © 2004 by MIIS.